|
KNOWING
WHEN TO STOP... OR NOT...
Taped
on my studio walI is a wonderful
quote from contemporary British painter Ken Howard:
A picture is done
when it gives back to you the sensation that you felt when you first
saw the subject.
It sounds so simple, right?
But In practice, knowing
when to stop working on a painting is one of the hardest parts
of the job. I can't tell you how many promising canvases I have ruined
by overworking them.
|

Jim
painting Ralph's Barns along the Grapeville Creek in Hannacroix,
April 2004. At this stage of the painting, there was still hope for
this one...
|
When I initially posted
these photographs of me working on Ralph's Barns, I assumed
that progress on the painting would take the usual trajectory of a
larger plein air piece, and that soon I would be ready to show off
an image of the finished painting.
But I lost the struggle
with this one. As you study the images below, note how the painting
stiffened up as I continued to work on it. Note how the liveliness
and energy visible in my brushwork early on are gradually buried in
subsequent layers of paint.
|
Click
on images to enlarge
This
beautifully situated cluster of barns form a powerful focal point
for a painting, while the shoreline provides a dynamic element leading
into the scene.
|

|

Ralph's Barns,
after about 20 minutes. A strong beginning is essential for any successful
plein air painting, and I believe still that this painting got off
to a terrific start.
|
|

Ralph's Barns,
seen about an hour into my first session. It is still looking fine:
my brushwork is vigorous, the space and atmosphere is nearly resolved.
At this point, I shifted my focus to the complications in the foreground...
and ran into trouble.
|

Ralph's Barns
at
the conclusion of two hours, as I packed up for the day. It is always
my goal to complete a plein air painting in one session (or alla
prima), but in this instance the complexity of the scene and rapidly
changing light tripped me up. My strong start seemed to weaken the
longer I worked on it. Note how the initially simple passages of darker
values have been broken up into distracting, smaller shapes.
The comment
above was written when I first posted these images, nearly two years
ago. Today I view this state of Ralph's Barns and I see that it was
nearly done. Indeed, I probably could have made minor adjustments
in the studio and had a fine painting. But, instead, I took the canvas
back out to try again in the field....
|
|

Ralph's Barns
after
a second day. The entire painting has been restated, and the foreground
seems to have been resolved
When working in
plein air, the light and atmosphere of every day is unique.
And if I take a painting back on site for an additional session, I have
to be willing to repaint the entire surface in order to maintain the
overall integrity of the experience.
Note how the overall
color balance of the painting has shifted with the leafing out of the
spring foliage. Only four days had elapsed since staring this painting,
but the scene had changed significantly. In addition, the weather on
this second day was clear and brighter than the first.
At the time,
in spring of 2004, I was convinced that I needed one more session to
correct the drawing of the barn, and to soften the dark wedge in the
water at the lower left. These are the kinds of corrections that I often
make in the studio, but for some reason I took the canvas back out on
site again. That proved to be a fatal error for this painting...
|

Ralph's Barns
after
a third on-site session, about a week after the initial day. Again,
I have essentially repainted much of the surface, especially on the
lower half of the painting. But as I continued to refine the drawing
of the barn, note how the edges became stiff and hard edged. In this
third stage, the complications of the marshy foreground are softer
and more subtle perhaps, but to my eye they have become flat and lifeless.
I was disheartened
after I brought this painting back home. I made a few feeble attempts
to finish it up here in the studio, but finally gave up. Today, it
is stacked in the corner of the room with other work that remains
unfinished, unresolved, and unloved.
|
|
So why did I keep hacking
away at this painting? What was wrong with it at the end of that very
first day?
As I look back at these
pictures today, I can not answer those questions. The painting in
its earlier stages looks fine to me now, but when I am immersed in
the creative process, I lose perspective, and my judgement often becomes
clouded.
After so many years of
painting, both in the field and in my studio, one would think that
I would have learned by now when to stop working on a painting.
But I still have more to learn.
It seems that my best paintings
are often those that are, by default, 'finished' when I am forced
to quit by external circumstances: a sharp change in the weather,
or running to make an appointment, or to meet the kids arriving home
on the schoolbus.
You would think there
is a lesson to be learned in that observation...
Top
of page
|